SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

DWA Estate Limited v Niko Mulaki Katambuka [2015] KEHC 4729 (KLR)

[2015] KEHC 4729 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
4729
Citation
[2015] KEHC 4729 (KLR)
Decided
29 April 2015
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from a judgment of the Principal MagistrateCoramB. Thurana Jaden
Holding

The Respondent was found to be an employee and injured while on duty, but the Appellant was found to be 50% liable. The appeal is allowed, and the judgment is modified to award Ksh 50,000/= in general damages, Ksh 2,000/= in special damages, and 50% of the costs.

Facts

Respondent Niko Mulaki Katambuka sued Appellant DWA Sisal Estate Limited for damages for injuries allegedly sustained while working for the Appellant. The Respondent claimed he was an employee and was injured while cutting sisal, blaming the Appellant for not providing gumboots. The Appellant denied the Respondent's claims.

Issues

  1. Whether the Respondent was an employee of the Appellant
  2. Whether the Respondent was injured while on duty
  3. Whether the Appellant was liable for the injuries
  4. Whether the award of damages was excessive

Reasoning

The court found the Respondent to be an employee and injured while on duty, but also found the Appellant to be 50% liable. The award of damages was deemed excessive and reduced to Ksh 50,000/=. The Appellant was also ordered to pay 50% of the costs.

Outcome

Appeal allowed, judgment modified

Orders

  • General damages Ksh 50,000/=
  • Special damages Ksh 2,000/=
  • 50% of the costs

Authorities cited

Cases cited (3)
  • STATPACK INDUSTRIES VS JAMES MBITHI NBI HCCA 152 OF 2003
  • KEMFRO AFRICA LIMITED T/A MERU EXPRESS SERVICE GATHOGO KANINI VS A. M. LUBIA AND OLIVE LUBIA [1982-1988] 1 KAR 727
  • Eldoret Steel Mills Limited VS. Jotham Wekesa Wanami [2012] eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case