SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

David Gitari Mucheke v Catherine Cianduru Mugo & another [2015] KEHC 515 (KLR)

[2015] KEHC 515 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
515
Citation
[2015] KEHC 515 (KLR)
Decided
20 November 2015
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeSuccessionPosturePetitioner sought grant of Letters of Administration, Caveator and Protestor opposed and sought to determine shares of beneficiariesCoramA. MABEYA
Holding

The estate is divided as follows: 6 acres to Catherine Cianduru Mugo, 0.50 acres to Margaret Ntabi Kiberenge, 2.3 acres to Margaret Cianduru Mucheke, and 0.50 acres to David Gitari Mucheke.

Facts

The deceased was married to two wives and had five children. The Petitioner petitioned for Letters of Administration, Caveator filed a Caveat, and Protestor filed a protest. The estate was divided into two plots, 1021 and 1022, with 1021 given to the Petitioner and 1022 to the deceased's eldest son, Mugo Mucheke.

Issues

  1. Who should administer the estate?
  2. How should the estate be divided among the beneficiaries?

Reasoning

The deceased shared his land between his two sons, Mugo Mucheke and David Gitari Mucheke. The evidence showed that the deceased had sold two portions of his land for the benefit of the children of both Mugo Mucheke and the Petitioner. The court distributed the estate based on this evidence and the rights of the beneficiaries.

Outcome

The grant of Letters of Administration is confirmed in the names of the three Administrators as appointed by the court.

Orders

  • The grant issued on 7th December, 2011 be re-issued in the names of the three (3) Administrators as appointed by this court and same be confirmed accordingly.
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case