SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Mohamed Ali Motha v Imperial Bank Limited [2015] KEHC 5810 (KLR)

[2015] KEHC 5810 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
5810
Citation
[2015] KEHC 5810 (KLR)
Decided
19 March 2015
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPostureApplication for enforcement of professional undertakingCoramA.K. Kaniaru
Holding

The application is allowed, and the respondent is granted 14 days to honour the undertaking. If the undertaking is not honoured, the order for enforcement will follow.

Facts

The plaintiff borrowed Kshs.7,500,000 from the defendant on 8/5/2014. The plaintiff defaulted in payment, and the defendant sought to realize payment by selling a land parcel. The defendant's firm, acting as the plaintiff's advocate, gave a professional undertaking to deposit the amount into the plaintiff's loan account and indemnify the bank in case of breach.

Issues

  1. Enforcement of professional undertaking given by the defendant's firm

Reasoning

The court found that the defendant's firm made a professional undertaking to the applicant, which it failed to honor. The court ruled in favor of the applicant, granting the respondent 14 days to honor the undertaking and allowing the order for enforcement if the undertaking is not honored.

Outcome

Application granted

Orders

  • 14 days granted to respondent to honor undertaking
  • Order for enforcement if undertaking not honored

Remedies

  • Enforcement of undertaking

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Civil Procedure Act (Cap 21)
  • Civil Procedure Rules
Cases cited (4)
  • MALINDI HOLDINGS & ESTATE AGENTS LIMITED VS MORRIS MWAMBUI
  • HARIT SHETH T/A HARIT SHETH ADVOCATE VS K.H. OSMOND T/A K.H OSMOND ADVOCATE
  • Section 50(1) of the Advocates Act
  • NAPHTALI PAUL RADIER VS DAVID NJOGU GACHANJA T/A D. NJOGU & CO ADVOCATES
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case