SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Elizabeth Chepkurui Goj v Joseph Rono & 6 others [2015] KEHC 6467 (KLR)

[2015] KEHC 6467 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
6467
Citation
[2015] KEHC 6467 (KLR)
Decided
27 February 2015
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeDeclaration on Ownership of LandPostureOriginal TrialCoramMUNYAO SILA
Holding

The court finds in favor of the plaintiff, Elizabeth Chepkurui Goj, declaring her family as the rightful owners of the land parcels and issuing a permanent injunction against the defendants.

Facts

The plaintiff, Elizabeth Chepkurui Goj, claimed that the land parcels L.R No. Kericho/Chesoen/1555 and L.R No. Kericho/Chesoen/1564 were solely owned by her deceased father, Kipkoskei Bii, and that the defendants, who were sons of Kipkoskei's brothers, had no rights to the land.

Issues

  1. Ownership of land parcels L.R No. Kericho/Chesoen/1555 and L.R No. Kericho/Chesoen/1564
  2. Defendants' rights to the land

Reasoning

The court ruled that the land was solely owned by the deceased father and that the defendants had no claim to the land, as there was no evidence of a trust or shared ownership.

Outcome

Plaintiff's suit succeeds with costs

Orders

  • Declare the family of Philip Kipkoskei Bii as the rightful owners of the land parcels Kericho/Chesoen/1555 and Kericho/Chesoen/1564
  • Issue a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from the land parcels Kericho/Chesoen/1555 and Kericho/Chesoen/1564
  • Defendants shall jointly and/or severally shoulder the costs of this suit

Remedies

  • Declaration of ownership
  • Permanent injunction
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case