SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Brookside Diary Limited v Attorney General,Industrial Court of Kenya & Bakery, Confectionary Food Manufacturing and Allied Workers Union (Petition 33 of 2011) [2015] KEHC 7671 (KLR) (Constitutional and Human Rights) (28 September 2015) (Judgment)

[2015] KEHC 7671 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
7671
Citation
[2015] KEHC 7671 (KLR)
Decided
28 September 2015
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypePetition for Review of Industrial Court DecisionPosturePetitioner seeks to review the decision of the Industrial Court in Industrial Cause No. 124N of 2009CoramISAAC LENAOLA MUMBI NGUGI, G.V. ODUNGA
Holding

The Court finds no violation of the petitioner's rights and dismisses the petition

Facts

The Industrial Court had ordered the petitioner to sign a recognition agreement with the interested party, Bakery, Confectionary Food Manufacturing and Allied Workers Union, despite the Union's claim to have recruited members from the petitioner's workforce.

Issues

  1. Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to hear and determine the issues raised in the petition
  2. Whether the Industrial Court's decision violated the petitioner's constitutional rights

Reasoning

The Court considers the pleadings and submissions, and finds that the Industrial Court was not without jurisdiction. The Court cannot issue orders in favor of the petitioner as the decision of the Industrial Court must be reviewed for merit.

Outcome

Petition dismissed

Authorities cited

Cases cited (4)
  • Nzoia Sugar Company vs Attorney General (2012) eKLR
  • Kenyatta University vs The Industrial Court of Kenya (2012) eKLR
  • Mecol Limited vs Attorney General and 7 Others (2006) eKLR
  • Republic vs Kenya National Examinations Council ex parte Gathenji and Others (1996) Civil Appeal No. 266 of 1996
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case