SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Republic v P M M [2015] KEHC 7806 (KLR)

[2015] KEHC 7806 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
7806
Citation
[2015] KEHC 7806 (KLR)
Decided
14 October 2015
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeMiscellaneous Criminal ApplicationPostureApplicant (Director of Public Prosecutions) appeals against the trial court's decision to decline the application for the complainant to testify with the assistance of an intermediary.CoramL. KIMARU
Holding

The complainant is a vulnerable witness and should testify with the assistance of an intermediary.

Facts

The complainant is a child and a person with mental disability, charged with incest with the Respondent, who is her father. A psychiatrist's report indicated the complainant's mental instability, but the report was not conclusive.

Issues

  1. Whether the complainant is a vulnerable witness under the Sexual Offences Act.
  2. Whether the complainant should testify with the assistance of an intermediary.

Reasoning

The court held that the complainant is a vulnerable witness due to her status as a child and a person with mental disability. The court directed the preparation of a new medical report to determine the nature of assistance the intermediary will provide.

Outcome

The trial court's order is set aside, and the complainant is declared a vulnerable witness and allowed to testify with the assistance of an intermediary.

Orders

  • Declare the complainant a vulnerable witness.
  • Allow the complainant to testify with the assistance of an intermediary.
  • Prepare a new medical report by the Psychiatrist.

Remedies

  • Reversal of the trial court's decision.
  • Declaration of the complainant as a vulnerable witness.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Sexual Offences Act
  • Evidence Act
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.0 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case