SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Karsan Velji Velani v National Land Commission [2015] KEHC 7892 (KLR)

[2015] KEHC 7892 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
7892
Citation
[2015] KEHC 7892 (KLR)
Decided
13 November 2015
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeAdministrative LawPosturePetition for Quashing Public Notice and Declaration of UnreasonablenessCoramMukunya
Holding

The Petitioner's petition is granted, and the Respondent's public notice is quashed. The notice is declared irregular, unreasonable, and procedurally unfair.

Facts

The Petitioner, Karsan Velji Velani, is the beneficiary and Administrator of the Estate of the Late Velji Parbat, who was the lessor of Plot No. L.R 12224 for 27 years and 6 months. The National Land Commission (Respondent) issued a public notice revoking the lease.

Issues

  1. violation of right to fair administrative action under Article 47 of the Constitution
  2. violation of right to property under Article 40 of the Constitution
  3. whether the Respondent has the mandate to revoke the lease

Reasoning

The Court found that the Respondent, as a constitutional commission, has the mandate to determine the extension and renewal of leases involving public land. The Court ruled that the Petitioner's rights were violated by the Respondent's revocation of the lease without affording him an opportunity to be heard.

Outcome

Petition granted, public notice quashed

Orders

  • Order to remove and quash the Public Notice
  • Declaration of the notice as irregular, unreasonable, and procedurally unfair

Remedies

  • Quashing of the Public Notice
  • Declaration of Unreasonableness

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • National Land Commission Act
  • Land Act
  • Constitution of Kenya
Cases cited (3)
  • Speaker of National Assembly vs Njenga Karume
  • Harrikinson vs Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago
  • Msa Judicial Review No.19 of 2012
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case