SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Burken Enterprises Ltd v Paul Nguru Mwai [2015] KEHC 8023 (KLR)

[2015] KEHC 8023 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
8023
Citation
[2015] KEHC 8023 (KLR)
Decided
9 November 2015
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppellant appeals a trial magistrate's order setting aside an ex parte judgment and ordering deposit of the entire decretal amount as a condition precedent to defending the suit.CoramR.E.ABURILI
Holding

The court orders a stay of execution and proceedings pending hearing and determination of the appeal, conditional upon the appellant depositing Kshs. 1,600,000 as security.

Facts

The respondent filed a suit against the appellant for payment of a liquidated sum of Ksh 2,000,000, which was entered in default of defense. The appellant filed an application to set aside the ex parte judgment and seek a stay of execution and proceedings.

Issues

  1. Whether the trial magistrate erred in law by failing to take into consideration the interest on the principal sum of Kshs. 800,000/=
  2. Whether the delay in filing the defense was inordinate to warrant a punitive condition

Reasoning

The court exercised its discretion to grant a stay of execution and proceedings, finding the appeal arguable and considering the need for expeditious disposal of the case.

Outcome

Appeal granted, stay of execution and proceedings granted.

Orders

  • Order for stay of execution and proceedings pending hearing and determination of the appeal
  • Order for deposit of Kshs. 1,600,000 as security

Remedies

  • Stay of execution and proceedings pending appeal

Authorities cited

Cases cited (1)
  • Global Tours and Travels Ltd Winding Up Cause No. 43 of 2000 (UR)
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case