SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Beta Healthcare International Ltd v Stephen Mukita t/a Musteky Enterprises [2015] KEHC 8401 (KLR)

[2015] KEHC 8401 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
8401
Citation
[2015] KEHC 8401 (KLR)
Decided
17 November 2015
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil SuitPostureApplication for Warrants of Attachment, Inter Partes Hearing, Stay of Order, Temporary InjunctionCoramGikonyo
Holding

The court found that the plaintiff failed to specify the property that should be attached, and thus, the court could not grant orders for the attachment of unspecified property.

Facts

The plaintiff, BETA HEALTHCARE INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, filed an application for warrants of attachment, tracing, and identification of the defendant's property, and for an account and delivery of proceeds from the sale of goods worth Kshs. 42,271,684.22. The defendant filed an application for a stay of the order requiring him to provide a Banker's Guarantee.

Issues

  1. Attachment of unspecified property
  2. Security for the sum of Kshs. 42,271,684.22
  3. Temporary injunction to restrain the defendant from selling or transferring shares, equity, property, and bank accounts

Reasoning

The court ruled that the plaintiff's application was defective because it did not specify the property to be attached, and therefore, the court could not grant the requested orders.

Outcome

The court denied the plaintiff's application for warrants of attachment, tracing, and identification of the defendant's property, and for an account and delivery of proceeds from the sale of goods.

Orders

  • Order for the defendant to deposit a Banker's Guarantee
  • Stay of the Order requiring the defendant to provide a Banker's Guarantee

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Civil Procedure Act
  • Civil Procedure Rules
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case