SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Republic v Resident Kadhi, Kwale Ex Parte Said Ramadhan Mwanjama [2016] KEHC 1000 (KLR)

[2016] KEHC 1000 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
1000
Citation
[2016] KEHC 1000 (KLR)
Decided
21 November 2016
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeMiscellaneous Civil ApplicationPostureEx parte application for certiorari and prohibitionCoramEDWARD M. MURIITHI
Holding

The ex parte applicant's application for certiorari and prohibition is declined. The Court makes no order as to costs due to the succession nature of the dispute.

Facts

The ex parte applicant filed an application for certiorari and prohibition against the decision of the Resident Kadhi in Kwale Kadhi Succession Case Number: 99 of 201, In Re: Estate of Ramadhan Mwanjama (Deceased). The Kadhi's Court had entered a final judgment on 8th June, 2012, and the ex parte applicant sought to quash the decision and admit the Notice of Motion Applications filed by the interested parties.

Issues

  1. Jurisdiction of Kadhi's Court
  2. Fair trial and natural justice
  3. Review of judgment

Reasoning

The Kadhi's Court has jurisdiction in succession causes on estates of deceased Muslims. The Court does not become functus officio for applications for setting aside or varying judgment. The ex parte applicant had been served and the application was set for expedited hearing.

Outcome

The judgment is reserved due to workload and transfer of the court station. The judgment is signed for delivery if the parties withdraw the matter.

Orders

  • Decline application for certiorari and prohibition
  • No order as to costs

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Civil Procedure Act
  • Kadhis' Court Act
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case