SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Indigo Telecom Limited v Independent Electoral and Boundary Commission Limited [2016] KEHC 112 (KLR)

[2016] KEHC 112 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
112
Citation
[2016] KEHC 112 (KLR)
Beta Machine-generated summary. Automatically produced by AI from the judgment text — it may be incomplete or inaccurate. Always verify against the full judgment below. Not legal advice.

Summary at a glance

The Court dismisses the application for judgment and orders that the Defendant's Statement of Defence be struck out. The Court also orders that all officers of the Defendant involved in the matters giving rise to these proceedings be personally joined as parties to the suit.

Facts

The Plaintiff, Indigo Telecom Limited, filed a Plaint seeking payment for equipment supplied to the Defendant, Independent Electoral and Boundary Commission Limited, under a Local Purchase Order dated 21st February 2013. The Defendant denied the Plaintiff's claims and stated that the Local Purchase Order was issued illegally.

Issues

  • Defendant's liability for payment
  • Procedural irregularities in issuing the Local Purchase Order

Reasoning

The Court finds that the Defendant is well and truly indebted to the Plaintiff for the sum of Kshs.39,364,272.30 together with interest. The Court dismisses the application for judgment and orders the Defendant's Statement of Defence to be struck out.

Outcome

The application for judgment is dismissed.

Orders

  • Defendant's Statement of Defence is struck out
  • All officers of the Defendant involved in the matters giving rise to these proceedings are personally joined as parties to the suit
⚠ This summary is experimental and generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It can contain errors, omissions, or misinterpretations and must not be relied on for legal decisions. The authoritative source is the full judgment. Please confirm every point against the original before use.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case