SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Republic v County Labour Commissioner Nairobi & 3 others Ex-parte Sichuan Huashi Enterprises Corporation East Africa Limited [2016] KEHC 1229 (KLR)

[2016] KEHC 1229 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
1229
Citation
[2016] KEHC 1229 (KLR)
Decided
2 December 2016
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil ApplicationPostureEx parte application for judicial reviewCoramG V ODUNGA
Holding

The court finds no merit in the applicant's application and dismisses the Notice of Motion with costs.

Facts

The applicant, Sichuan Huashi Enterprises Corporation East Africa Limited, sought to quash charge sheets, warrants of arrest, and criminal proceedings against them, alleging the proceedings were defective and an abuse of process.

Issues

  1. Whether the applicant's application for judicial review meets the threshold for issuance of judicial review orders.
  2. Whether the criminal proceedings against the applicant are an abuse of process, arbitrary, capricious, and brought in bad faith.

Reasoning

The court held that the mere fact that the criminal proceedings are likely to fail is not a ground for halting them. The court also cited cases where criminal proceedings were halted for being oppressive and vexatious, and where the charge sheet did not disclose the commission of a criminal offence.

Outcome

The Notice of Motion is dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • Notice of Motion dated 8th August, 2016 is dismissed with costs.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Labour Institutions Act 2007
  • Civil Procedure Rules 2010
Cases cited (3)
  • R vs. Attorney General exp Kipngeno Arap Ngeny
  • Joram Mwenda Guantai vs. The Chief Magistrate
  • Meixner & Another vs. Attorney General
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case