SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Anthony Mbuthi Kabui v Maisha Flour Mills Ltd [2016] KEHC 1232 (KLR)

[2016] KEHC 1232 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
1232
Citation
[2016] KEHC 1232 (KLR)
Decided
2 December 2016
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from a judgment and decree in a civil caseCoramNgaah Jairus
Holding

The appeal is allowed in part, and the appellant is ordered to pay Kshs 2,580,950.00 to the respondent, with costs and interest.

Facts

The respondent sued the appellant for the delivery of wheat flour worth Kshs 3,752,950.00, but only Kshs 511,150.00 was paid. The appellant admitted owing Kshs 520,000.00, and the rest went to trial. The appellant appealed, alleging errors in the trial court's judgment.

Issues

  1. Whether the trial court erred in entering judgment against the appellant for Kshs 2,720,900.
  2. Whether the trial court failed to appreciate the plaintiff's claim based on specific invoices.
  3. Whether the trial court dismissed the defendant's evidence regarding dishonoured cheques.
  4. Whether the trial court entered a hefty judgment without analyzing invoices against cheques.
  5. Whether the trial court accepted the plaintiff's allegation of accounting for all cash paid by the defendant without evidence.

Reasoning

The appellant admitted owing Kshs 520,000.00, and the balance was Kshs 2,580,950.00 after deducting the payments made. The appellant's evidence of receipts for payments made was not challenged.

Outcome

Appeal allowed in part

Orders

  • Judgment for Kshs 2,580,950.00
  • Costs and interest to be calculated at court rates from the date of the magistrate's court judgment

Remedies

  • Judgment for Kshs 2,580,950.00
  • Costs and interest
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case