SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Republic v County Government of Busia Exparte Jackson Alwena Luhangala & another [2016] KEHC 138 (KLR)

[2016] KEHC 138 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
138
Citation
[2016] KEHC 138 (KLR)
Decided
9 November 2016
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeJudicial ReviewPostureEx parte application for prohibition and mandamusCoramA.K.KANIARU
Holding

The application is dismissed with costs as the remedies sought are not the most effective way to redress the Ex parte Applicants' problems.

Facts

Ex parte Applicants are registered owners of land parcels in Busia town. The County Government of Busia has created a new road in the area without their consent, disrupting water and electricity supply.

Issues

  1. Whether the County Government's road construction is in violation of the Exparte Applicants' constitutional and statutory rights.
  2. Whether the Exparte Applicants can seek judicial review for the road construction without showing that the road passes through their land.

Reasoning

The court finds that the Exparte Applicants' application is flawed due to the unclear nature of the road construction and the lack of evidence showing that the road passes through their land. Injunctions are deemed more effective for redressing the issues.

Outcome

Application dismissed with costs

Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case