SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Catherine Mugendi v Brookside Diary Ltd [2016] KEHC 1660 (KLR)

[2016] KEHC 1660 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
1660
Citation
[2016] KEHC 1660 (KLR)
Decided
3 November 2016
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from a judgment and decree of the Hon. L. Kassan (Mr.) SPMCoramL NJUGUNA
Holding

The application for a stay of execution pending appeal is allowed, with Mugendi required to pay half of the decretal sum (Ksh.106,154) as a condition for the stay.

Facts

Catherine Mugendi was found liable to Brookside Diary Ltd for Ksh.86,734 for material damage to a motor vehicle following a road accident. Mugendi appealed, claiming she had sold the vehicle before the accident and that she would suffer substantial loss if the judgment was enforced.

Issues

  1. Whether Mugendi would suffer substantial loss if the judgment was enforced.
  2. Whether the application was made without unreasonable delay.
  3. Whether Mugendi had given sufficient security for the decree or order as may ultimately be binding on her.

Reasoning

The court found that Mugendi was not in a financial position to raise the full decretal sum and that the application was not made without unreasonable delay. The court exercised its discretion to grant the stay, considering the interests of both parties.

Outcome

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • There shall be a stay of execution pending the hearing and determination of the appeal.
  • As a condition for the stay, the Appellant shall pay half of the decretal sum to the Respondent.

Remedies

  • Stay of execution pending appeal

Authorities cited

Cases cited (1)
  • Kenya Shell Limited Vs Kibiru (1986) KLR 410 Gachuhi
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case