SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Catherine Wanjiku Muriithi v Stephen Njoroge Mbugua & 2 others [2016] KEHC 1737 (KLR)

[2016] KEHC 1737 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
1737
Citation
[2016] KEHC 1737 (KLR)
Decided
27 October 2016
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeSuccessionPostureApplication for determination of access to landCoramL. A. Achode
Holding

The court orders the respondent to open the access road and remove any encroachments within seven days.

Facts

The deceased Patrick Mbugua Njoroge left an estate consisting of four properties. The estate was distributed among four beneficiaries, including the applicant Catherine Wanjiku Muriithi. The applicant claims she was denied access to her portion of the estate due to the respondent Stephen Njoroge Mbugua's actions.

Issues

  1. Access to the applicant's portion of the estate
  2. Distribution of the deceased's estate

Reasoning

The court found that the respondent's actions of cordoning off the public road of access were contrary to equity and good conscience, and denied the applicant a plain, adequate, and complete remedy at law.

Outcome

The application is allowed with the orders to open the access road and remove encroachments.

Orders

  • The 9 meter cul-de-sac needs to be opened and freed of any encroachments within seven days.
  • The O.C.S Langata Police officer or other officer of the rank above an Assistant Inspector of Police shall provide security and police assistance for the execution of the above orders.

Remedies

  • Injunction to open the access road and remove encroachments

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Civil Procedure Act Chapter 21 Laws of Kenya
  • Civil Procedure Rules
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case