SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Ephantus Gikonyo Maina & 2 others v Muraguri Gathegu [2016] KEHC 1851 (KLR)

[2016] KEHC 1851 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
1851
Citation
[2016] KEHC 1851 (KLR)
Decided
11 November 2016
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil SuitPostureAppeal from a previous ruling dismissing the Plaintiffs' claim for a declaration that they are the biological children of the Defendant and entitled to inherit his properties.CoramH P G WAWERU
Holding

The Plaintiffs' claim is res judicata and the suit is hereby struck out with costs to the Defendant.

Facts

The Plaintiffs, Ephantus Gikonyo Maina, Harrison Maina Gikonyo, and John Mwangi Maina, are seeking a declaration that they are the biological children of the Defendant, Muraguri Gathegu, and entitled to inherit his properties. The Defendant is alive and well.

Issues

  1. Whether the Plaintiffs' claim is res judicata due to a previous ruling dismissing their claim in a previous case.
  2. Whether the Plaintiffs have a reasonable cause of action to inherit the Defendant's properties as they are adults and the Defendant is alive.

Reasoning

The Plaintiffs' claim is res judicata because it was previously dismissed for failure to disclose a reasonable cause of action. The Plaintiffs are attempting to enforce their perceived rights of inheritance under the Law of Succession Act in respect to the estate of a living person, which is misconceived.

Outcome

The Plaintiffs' suit is struck out with costs to the Defendant.

Orders

  • The Plaintiffs' suit is hereby struck out with costs to the Defendant.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Law of Succession Act, Cap 160
Cases cited (1)
  • Murang’a CMCC No. 166 of 2012
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.0 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case