SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

MOO v Republic (Criminal Appeal 112 of 2015) [2016] KEHC 1945 (KLR) (13 October 2016) (Judgment)

[2016] KEHC 1945 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
1945
Citation
[2016] KEHC 1945 (KLR)
Decided
13 October 2016
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCriminal AppealPostureAppeal from conviction and sentenceCoramJ. A. Makaau, K. Odhiambo, L. Atika
Holding

The conviction of committing an indecent act with a child is quashed, and the appellant is found guilty of delement contrary to section 8(2) of the Sexual Offences Act. The appellant is sentenced to three (3) years non-custodial sentence.

Facts

The appellant, MOO, was convicted of committing an indecent act with a child contrary to section 11(1) of the Sexual Offences Act, and sentenced to 10 years imprisonment. The appellant was a minor at the time of the offence.

Issues

  1. Whether the prosecution ought to have charged the appellant with the oence of delement or incest given they were cousins with the complainant.
  2. Whether the appellant’s constitutional right not to be held at the police cells for more than 24 hours after he was arrested, was violated.

Reasoning

The evidence did not support the charge of incest, and the appellant should have been charged with delement. The trial court failed to consider the appellant's status as a minor and the need for a speedy trial.

Outcome

Appeal successful, conviction and sentence quashed, new conviction and sentence imposed.

Orders

  • Quash conviction of committing an indecent act with a child
  • Convict appellant of delement contrary to section 8(2) of the Sexual Offences Act
  • Sentence appellant to three (3) years non-custodial sentence

Remedies

  • Revoke original sentence of 10 years imprisonment
  • Impose new sentence of three (3) years non-custodial sentence

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Sexual Offences Act, No 3 of 2006
  • Children Act, 2001
Cases cited (1)
  • Njuki and 4 others v R (2002) 1KLR 771
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case