SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Kimatu Mbuvi v Patrick Wambua John [2016] KEHC 2068 (KLR)

[2016] KEHC 2068 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
2068
Citation
[2016] KEHC 2068 (KLR)
Decided
12 October 2016
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureRespondent seeks to declare the appeal abated and costs to be borne by the estate of the Appellant; Applicants seek to be substituted as personal representatives of the deceased Appellant's estate and time to apply for substitution and revival of the appeal.CoramP. NYAMWEYA
Holding

The Court did not declare the appeal abated and granted the Applicants time to apply for substitution and revival of the appeal.

Facts

The appeal was filed by the estate of the deceased Appellant, and the personal representatives of the estate were not able to agree on the personal representatives of the estate, leading to the delay in substitution and revival of the appeal.

Issues

  1. Whether the Court should extend the time within which the personal representatives of the estate of the Appellant should apply for substitution of the Appellant and revive the appeal.
  2. Whether the Court should declare the appeal abated and costs to be borne by the estate of the Appellant.

Reasoning

The Court considered the provisions of Order 24, Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Rules and Rule 9, in the application of the Order to appeals, and found that the personal representatives of the estate of the deceased Appellant were not at fault for the delay in substitution and revival of the appeal.

Outcome

The appeal was not declared abated and the Applicants were granted time to apply for substitution and revival of the appeal.

Orders

  • Granting the Applicants time to apply for substitution and revival of the appeal.
  • Declining to declare the appeal abated and costs to be borne by the estate of the Appellant.

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • Civil Procedure Rules
  • Order 24, Rule 3
  • Rule 9
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case