SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Acqualine Distributors Limited v Coastal Bottlers Limited [2016] KEHC 2671 (KLR)

[2016] KEHC 2671 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
2671
Citation
[2016] KEHC 2671 (KLR)
Decided
19 September 2016
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeMiscellaneous ApplicationPostureApplication for dismissal and Notice of intention to withdraw the application
Holding

The application dated March 29, 2016 is incompetent, bad in law, and an abuse of the process of the court and is struck out with costs.

Facts

The plaintiff filed a Notice of Motion on January 18, 2013 seeking leave to commence contempt proceedings. The defendant filed a Notice of Withdrawal on March 31, 2014. The plaintiff then filed a Notice of Motion on March 29, 2016.

Issues

  1. The applicant's application is incompetent, bad in law, and an abuse of the process of the court.
  2. The Notice of Motion was not an exparte application as required by the Supreme Court Practice Rules.
  3. The plaintiff abandoned the application and the court became functus officio.
  4. The application dated March 29, 2016 is void and a nullity.

Reasoning

The court found that the plaintiff's application was not an exparte application as required by the Supreme Court Practice Rules and that the plaintiff had abandoned the application, rendering the court functus officio.

Outcome

The application dated March 29, 2016 is struck out with costs.

Orders

  • The Notice of Motion dated 18th January, 2013 for hearing is set down for further steps.

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • Civil Procedure Act
  • Civil Procedure Rules
  • Supreme Court Practice Rules
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case