SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Bonface Nzioka Malundi v Jeremiah Kariuki Mwaniki [2016] KEHC 3631 (KLR)

[2016] KEHC 3631 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
3631
Citation
[2016] KEHC 3631 (KLR)
Decided
6 June 2016
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureApplicant seeks stay of execution of judgmentCoramR. Njue
Holding

The court finds that the applicant has an arguable appeal and that the subject matter of the appeal should be preserved pending the hearing and determination of the appeal. The applicant should deposit a sum of Kshs. 1,500,000/- into the court as a condition of granting the stay of execution.

Facts

Applicant Bonface Nzioka Malundi seeks stay of execution of a judgment in favor of Respondent Jeremiah Kariuki Mwaniki, totaling Kshs. 4,720,934.85 plus costs and interest. Applicant claims threat of execution unless stay is granted and argues his appeal is arguable.

Issues

  1. Whether the applicant has an arguable appeal
  2. Whether the applicant has suffered substantial loss unless the execution of the decree is stayed
  3. Whether the applicant has provided security for the due performance of the decree

Reasoning

The court finds the applicant's appeal to be arguable and that the subject matter of the appeal should be preserved. The court considers the substantial loss and the security provided by the applicant.

Outcome

Order for stay of execution pending the hearing and determination of the appeal

Orders

  • Deposit of Kshs. 1,500,000/- into the court as a condition of granting the stay of execution

Remedies

  • Preservation of the subject matter of the appeal pending the hearing and determination of the appeal
  • Deposit of Kshs. 1,500,000/- into the court as a condition of granting the stay of execution

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Civil Procedure Act (Cap 21) Laws of Kenya
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.0 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case