SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Republic v University of Nairobi & another Ex-Parte Nabiswa Wakenya Moses [2016] KEHC 4571 (KLR)

[2016] KEHC 4571 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
4571
Citation
[2016] KEHC 4571 (KLR)
Decided
27 June 2016
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeJudicial ReviewPostureEx parte application for mandamus and prohibitionCoramGoudie, Nyamu, Visram
Holding

The court held that an order of mandamus cannot be granted to compel the performance of a ceremonial function such as swearing in, as it is not a legal obligation. However, the court found that an order of mandamus can be granted to compel the performance of a public duty imposed by statute, where the duty is not being performed.

Facts

The applicant, Nabiswa Wakenya Moses, contested for the position of student representative for KNH Campus during the April 2016 elections. Kodiwo Anthony Bernard was also a contestant. The election was conducted by the Student Organization of Nairobi University (SONU).

Issues

  1. Whether an order of mandamus can be granted to compel the University of Nairobi and SONU to enforce the ruling declaring the applicant the winner of the KNH Campus representative post.
  2. Whether an order of mandamus can be granted to prohibit the University of Nairobi and SONU from allowing any person to discharge duties in the position of KNH Campus representative and to swear in the applicant as the duly legally elected official of SONU in the position of finance secretary.

Reasoning

The court cited precedents to explain the nature and purpose of mandamus, emphasizing that it is a command requiring a person to do something in the nature of a public duty to remedy defects of justice. The court ruled that an order of mandamus can be granted to compel the performance of a duty imposed by statute, but not to quash a decision already made.

Outcome

The court dismissed the application for mandamus and prohibition.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Universities Act No. 42 of 2012
  • Law Reform Act Cap 26
Cases cited (2)
  • Kenya National Examinations Council vs. Republic Ex parte Geoffrey Gathenji Njoroge & Others Civil Appeal No. 266 of 1996 (CAK) [1997] eKLR
  • Shah vs. Attorney General (No. 3) Kampala HCMC No. 31 of 1969 [1970] EA 543 Goudie, J
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case