SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Masisi Mwita v Damaris Wanjiku Njeri [2016] KEHC 7349 (KLR)

[2016] KEHC 7349 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
7349
Citation
[2016] KEHC 7349 (KLR)
Decided
18 February 2016
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppellant sought an order of stay of execution of the judgment pending the hearing and determination of the intended appeal.CoramJohn M. Mativo
Holding

The application is dismissed with costs to the respondent.

Facts

The appellant filed an appeal against a judgment in Thilka CMCC No. 342 of 2010, and sought a stay of execution of the judgment pending the appeal.

Issues

  1. Whether the appellant is dissatisfied with the decision of the lower court and intends to appeal.
  2. Whether the respondent will suffer prejudice if the application is allowed.
  3. Whether the applicant has proved substantial loss.
  4. Whether the respondent is entitled to the fruits of the judgment.

Reasoning

The court found that the applicant did not prove substantial loss and that the respondent is entitled to the fruits of the judgment.

Outcome

Dismissed

Orders

  • Application dismissed with costs to the respondent.

Authorities cited

Cases cited (18)
  • Civil Procedure Rules 2010
  • Civil Procedure Act
  • High Court Civil Appeal No. 62 of 2008
  • Supra
  • Civil App No. NAI 6 of 1979
  • HC Misc No. 42 of 2012 OR {2012} eKLR
  • {2002} 1 KLR 867
  • {2006}eKLR
  • {2012}eKLR
  • {1993} KLR 365
  • {2013}eKLR
  • Supra note 6
  • Supra note 14
  • {2002} KLR 63
  • {2013}eKLR
  • 4th Edition, Vol 37 pages 330-332
  • WC No. 43 of 200 (UR)
  • Civil Application number NAI 322 of 2006 (UR)
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case