SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Republic v Kenya Veterinary Board & 2 others Ex-Parte Isaac Kiondo Muiruri & 4 others [2016] KEHC 7686 (KLR)

[2016] KEHC 7686 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
7686
Citation
[2016] KEHC 7686 (KLR)
Decided
25 May 2016
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeJudicial ReviewPostureEx parte application for prohibitionCoramNot explicitly named in the text, but implied to be the presiding judges.
Holding

The court found the Board's decision to revoke the certificates was not tainted with illegality, irrationality, or procedural impropriety.

Facts

The applicants, Isaac Kiondo Muiruri and others, were issued certificates by the Kenya Veterinary Board but later received notices of revocation without reasons. They claim the Registrar and Inspector General of Police threatened them.

Issues

  1. Whether the Board's decision to revoke the certificates is tainted with illegality, irrationality, and procedural impropriety.
  2. Whether the ex parte applicants are entitled to an order of prohibition preventing the Board from revoking the certificates and instigating criminal charges based on the Board's certificates.

Reasoning

The court applied the principles of judicial review and cited cases to explain that the court's role is to ensure fair treatment and not to substitute its opinion for that of the authority.

Outcome

The ex parte applicants' application for an order of prohibition was dismissed.

Authorities cited

Cases cited (5)
  • Republic vs. Kenya National Examinations Council ex parte Gathenji & Others Civil Appeal No. 266 of 1996
  • Municipal Council of Mombasa vs. Republic &Umoja Consultants Ltd Civil Appeal No. 185 of 2001
  • Republic vs. Kenya Revenue Authority Ex parte Yaya Towers Limited [2008] eKLR
  • Pastoli vs. Kabale District Local Government Council and Others [2008] 2 EA 300
  • An Application by Bukoba Gymkhana Club [1963] EA 478
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case