SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Republic v Chairman, Business Premises Rent Tribunal & another [2016] KEHC 7945 (KLR)

[2016] KEHC 7945 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
7945
Citation
[2016] KEHC 7945 (KLR)
Decided
8 August 2016
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeJudicial ReviewPostureApplication for Judicial ReviewCoramIbrahim, James Gachan, Kimaru
Holding

The High Court has jurisdiction to set aside orders of stay granted under subrule (4) and an aggrieved party has the option of returning to the Judge who issued the orders or to file an appeal to the Court of Appeal.

Facts

The applicants are tenants of business premises and are aggrieved by orders of the Business Premises Rent Tribunal. They seek to set aside the orders and review the proceedings.

Issues

  1. Jurisdiction of the High Court to set aside leave and/or stay granted in judicial review proceedings
  2. Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to set aside stay while leaving the leave intact
  3. Whether the High Court has wide powers to grant, vary, discharge or set aside orders of stay granted under subrule (4)

Reasoning

The Court of Appeal has held that the grant of leave to set aside leave is an exercise of judicial discretion based on the prevailing circumstances. The High Court has wide powers to do so on such terms as are just.

Outcome

The High Court has jurisdiction to set aside orders of stay granted under subrule (4) and an aggrieved party has the option of returning to the Judge who issued the orders or to file an appeal to the Court of Appeal.

Orders

  • The High Court has jurisdiction to set aside orders of stay granted under subrule (4) and an aggrieved party has the option of returning to the Judge who issued the orders or to file an appeal to the Court of Appeal.

Remedies

  • The High Court has jurisdiction to set aside orders of stay granted under subrule (4) and an aggrieved party has the option of returning to the Judge who issued the orders or to file an appeal to the Court of Appeal.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Chapter 301 of the Laws of Kenya
Cases cited (2)
  • R vs. Communications Commission of Kenya & 2 Others ex Parte East Africa Televisions Network Ltd. Civil Appeal No. 175 of 2000 [2001] KLR 82; [2001] 1 EA 199
  • Nakumatt Holdings Limited vs. Commissioner of Value Added Tax [2011] eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case