SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Republic v Attorney General Ex Parte Evelyne Khamasi Amboyi [2016] KEHC 8019 (KLR)

[2016] KEHC 8019 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
8019
Citation
[2016] KEHC 8019 (KLR)
Decided
23 September 2016
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeJudicial ReviewPostureRespondent's Application for Review of DecreeCoramG V ODUNGA
Holding

The actual sum due is Kshs 742,891/= which was due as at 22nd March, 2011 plus interest on Kshs 640,000.00 at court rate till December, 2014, plus costs of Kshs 98,311/= less Kshs 898,311.00.

Facts

The applicant sought a mandamus order compelling the accounting officer responsible for the National Police Service to pay Kshs 742,891/= as at 22nd March, 2011 and costs of Kshs 98,311/= as at the same date together with interest at court rate till payment in full. The respondent was ordered to refund Kshs 640,000.00 to the applicant with costs and interests of the suit.

Issues

  1. Interest on costs
  2. Actual sum due

Reasoning

The court held that interest can only be charged on the principle sum and costs where the court expressly states so. Since the decree was silent on interest on costs, the same cannot be imposed by implication.

Outcome

The matter was placed before the Deputy Registrar to compute the sum due, if any, in accordance with the directions hereinabove and thereafter forward the file back for further orders.

Orders

  • The matter be placed before the Deputy Registrar to compute the sum due, if any, in accordance with the directions hereinabove and thereafter forward the file back for further orders.

Authorities cited

Cases cited (2)
  • Mukisa Biscuit Manufacturing Co. Ltd vs. West End Distributors Ltd (No. 2) Civil Appeal No. 37 of 1969 [1970] EA 469
  • Arthur Kinuthia Albert vs. Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Health [2008] eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case