SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Parkinyaro Ole Pursumari Koroi & another v Republic [2016] KEHC 8313 (KLR)

[2016] KEHC 8313 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
8313
Citation
[2016] KEHC 8313 (KLR)
Decided
15 November 2016
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCriminal RevisionPostureApplicant seeks to have the trial de novo due to non-compliance with Section 200 of the Criminal Procedure Code.CoramG.W. NGENYE-MACHARIA
Holding

The trial will not be heard de novo. The proceedings taken by Hon. Mwinzi in respect of the evidence of PW2 are expunged. PW2 will be recalled to testify afresh unless the accused persons indicate they do not wish for the witness to testify afresh.

Facts

Hon. Mwinzi took over the trial on 1st October, 2015 and heard the evidence of PW2 before the trial was taken over by Hon. Mutula on 28th April, 2016. The Applicant claims non-compliance with Section 200 of the Criminal Procedure Code.

Issues

  1. Non-compliance with Section 200 of the Criminal Procedure Code
  2. Recalling of PW1 for re-examination

Reasoning

The illegible recording by Hon. Mwinzi does not allow for the determination of compliance with Section 200. The trial will not be heard de novo as there is no reason to recall PW1, and the delay would negate expeditious administration of justice.

Outcome

The trial will not be heard de novo. The proceedings taken by Hon. Mwinzi in respect of the evidence of PW2 are expunged. PW2 will be recalled to testify afresh unless the accused persons indicate they do not wish for the witness to testify afresh.

Orders

  • Expunge the proceedings taken by Hon. Mwinzi in respect of the evidence of PW2
  • Order that PW2 be recalled to testify afresh unless the accused persons indicate they do not wish for the witness to testify afresh

Remedies

  • Recall of PW2 to testify afresh

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • Section 200
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.0 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case