SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Raphael Mutinda Mbithi v Timothy Theuri & another another [2017] KEHC 1055 (KLR)

[2017] KEHC 1055 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
1055
Citation
[2017] KEHC 1055 (KLR)
Decided
12 July 2017
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
Typecivil appealPostureappeal from a judgment of the High Court of KenyaCoramC. KARIUKI
Holding

The court awarded Kshs.755,975/= in total (general damages Kshs.700,000/+, special damages Kshs.55,975/+) to the appellant, and costs in this court and the trial court plus interest from the date of this judgment to the date of payment.

Facts

The plaintiff/appellant filed a claim for general and special damages after an incident involving the respondent(s). The plaintiff claimed for costs of external fixators, payment to Machakos Hospital, and other medical expenses. The defendants argued that the plaintiff could only prove costs of external fixators and payment to Machakos Hospital, totaling Kshs.23,445/=. The plaintiff submitted that he proved medical expenses, a medical report, police abstract, search fees, police officer's attendance, and doctor's attendance, totaling Kshs.55,975/=. The trial court awarded Kshs.55,975/= under the special damages head.

Issues

  1. amount of special damages
  2. proof of future medical expenses

Reasoning

The court agreed with the plaintiff's proof of special damages and awarded the full amount. The court also awarded general damages and costs, finding no evidence to support future medical expenses.

Outcome

Appeal upheld

Orders

  • award of Kshs.755,975/= to the appellant
  • costs in this court and the trial court plus interest

Remedies

  • award of Kshs.755,975/= to the appellant
  • costs in this court and the trial court plus interest
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case