SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Otieno Yogo & Company Advocates v UAP Provisional Insurance Company Limited [2017] KEHC 1247 (KLR)

[2017] KEHC 1247 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
1247
Citation
[2017] KEHC 1247 (KLR)
Decided
11 December 2017
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil ApplicationPostureApplicant seeks orders for judgment on a certificate of taxation and interest on costsCoramT.W. CHERERE
Holding

Judgment is entered for the advocate against the respondent for Kshs. 64,812 and interest on the taxed costs at 14% per annum from 17.2.17 until payment in full

Facts

The applicant, Otieno Yogo & Company Advocates, seeks judgment for Kshs. 64,812 in costs from the respondent, UAP Provisional Insurance Company Limited, who has not paid the taxed costs. The costs were taxed on 27.2.17 and a certificate of taxation was issued.

Issues

  1. Judgment on the certificate of taxation
  2. Interest on the taxed costs

Reasoning

The court held that there was no dispute as to retainer and the certificate of taxation had not been set aside or altered, allowing the judgment sought by the applicant.

Outcome

Judgment in favor of the applicant

Orders

  • Judgment for the advocate against the respondent for Kshs. 64,812
  • Interest on the taxed costs at 14% per annum from 17.2.17 until payment in full
  • The Advocate will also have the costs of this application

Remedies

  • Judgment for the advocate against the respondent for Kshs. 64,812
  • Interest on the taxed costs at 14% per annum from 17.2.17 until payment in full

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Advocates Act Cap 16 Laws of Kenya
  • Advocates Remuneration Order
Cases cited (1)
  • Musyoka & Wambua Advocates Vs Rustam Hira Advocate (2006) eKLR
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case