SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Republic v Chief Magistrate’s Court (Milimani Commercial Division) & 2 others Ex parte Joab Onyango Oliech [2017] KEHC 1665 (KLR)

[2017] KEHC 1665 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
1665
Citation
[2017] KEHC 1665 (KLR)
Decided
18 December 2017
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeMiscellaneous Civil CausePostureApplication for leave to apply for orders of certiorari, prohibition and mandamusCoramMajanja, Megarry, Mumbi Ngugi, Nyamu, Ochieng, Oguk, Waki
Holding

The court granted the applicant leave to apply for orders of certiorari, prohibition, and mandamus.

Facts

The applicant, Joab Onyango Oliech, sought leave to apply for orders against the Chief Magistrate's Court (Milimani Commercial Division) and the Attorney General. The court was asked to review a ruling made on 25th September, 2017, in CMCC No. 487 of 2008. The applicant alleged that the court's ruling was based on a statute barred action and that the 3rd Respondent had filed a tort claim on 11th January, 2005.

Issues

  1. Whether the applicant has an arguable case for granting leave to apply for orders of certiorari, prohibition, and mandamus.
  2. Whether the leave to apply should operate as a stay of the proceedings.

Reasoning

The court considered the requirements for leave to apply for judicial review and cited several cases to support the need for leave. The court found that the applicant had an arguable case and that the leave should operate as a stay.

Outcome

Leave granted

Orders

  • Leave to apply for orders of certiorari, prohibition, and mandamus granted

Remedies

  • Stay of the proceedings

Authorities cited

Cases cited (5)
  • Matiba vs. Attorney General Nairobi H.C. Misc. Application No. 790 of 1993
  • Republic vs. Land Disputes Tribunal Court Central Division and Another Ex Parte Nzioka [2006] 1 EA 321
  • Republic vs. County Council of Kwale & Another Ex Parte Kondo & 57 Others Mombasa HCMCA No. 384 of 1996
  • Mirugi Kariuki vs. Attorney General Civil Appeal No. 70 of 1991 [1990-1994] EA 156; [1992] KLR 8
  • Re Bivac International SA (Bureau Veritas) [2005] 2 EA 43 (HCK)
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case