SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Moses Muteithia & 5 others v Jacob Muthomi Kirera & 4 others [2017] KEHC 2401 (KLR)

[2017] KEHC 2401 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
2401
Citation
[2017] KEHC 2401 (KLR)
Decided
31 October 2017
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeConstitutional PetitionPostureRespondent's Motion for Interlocutory SuspensionCoramMajaja, Majanja
Holding

The 1st Respondent was a public officer and was subject to suspension under Section 62 of the Anti-Corruption and Economic Crimes Act, 2003. The 2nd and 5th Respondents had a statutory obligation to suspend the 1st Respondent at half pay pending the conclusion of the criminal case.

Facts

The 1st Respondent was charged with corruption and economic crimes on 15th July 2016. The 2nd and 5th Respondents are the employer and Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission (EACC) respectively.

Issues

  1. Whether the 1st Respondent was subject to suspension under Article 260 of the Constitution and Section 62 of the Anti-Corruption and Economic Crimes Act, 2003.
  2. Whether the 2nd and 5th Respondents had a statutory obligation to suspend the 1st Respondent at half pay pending the conclusion of the criminal case.

Reasoning

The suspension was a permissible act within the Constitution and other laws dealing with integrity, and did not violate the right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty.

Outcome

The 1st Respondent was not suspended at half pay as the 2nd and 5th Respondents did not deny the allegations and did not suspend the 1st Respondent.

Authorities cited

Legislation (4)
  • Article 260 of the Constitution of Kenya 2010
  • Section 62 of the Anti-Corruption and Economic Crimes Act, 2003
  • Section 2 of the Public Officer Ethics Act 2003
  • Section 3 of the Interpretation and General Provisions Act
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case