SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Philip Kyalo Kituti Kaloki v Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission & 2 others [2017] KEHC 2450 (KLR)

[2017] KEHC 2450 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
2450
Citation
[2017] KEHC 2450 (KLR)
Decided
10 November 2017
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeElection PetitionPostureRespondent's AppealCoramC. KARIUKI
Holding

The court upheld the election results and dismissed the petition.

Facts

The case pertains to the election of the Member of National Assembly for Kibwezi East constituency held on 8th August 2017. The petitioner, Philip Kyalo Kituti Kaloki, challenges the election conducted by the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (IEBC) and the Returning Officer, Kibwezi East Constituency.

Issues

  1. Whether the election was substantially in accordance with the Constitution and laws.
  2. Whether the election had illegalities that rendered it null and void.
  3. Whether electoral malpractices altered the election results.
  4. Whether the tally of votes was manipulated.
  5. Whether a sufficient legal basis for scrutiny and recount was demonstrated.
  6. What orders the court can make.

Reasoning

The court found that the election was conducted in accordance with the Constitution and laws, and there were no substantial irregularities or malpractices that would render the election null and void.

Outcome

The petition was dismissed.

Authorities cited

Legislation (7)
  • Elections Act No. 24 of 2011
  • Elections (General) Regulations, 2012
  • Elections (Technology) Regulations, 2017
  • Elections (Parliamentary) Act
  • Electoral and Boundaries Commission Act No. 9 of 2012
  • Access to Information Act No. 31 of 2016
  • Elections Offences Act No. 37 of 2016
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case