SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Philip Kyalo Kituti Kaloki v Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission & 2 others [2017] KEHC 2453 (KLR)

[2017] KEHC 2453 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
2453
Citation
[2017] KEHC 2453 (KLR)
Decided
10 November 2017
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeElection PetitionPosturePetitioner vs RespondentsCoramC. KARIUKI
Holding

The court found that the election results were valid and that the respondents complied with the relevant laws and regulations.

Facts

The petition involves the Member of National Assembly elections for Kibwezi East Constituency held on August 8, 2017, and disputes over the conduct of the election, including the Elections Act, Elections (General) Regulations, 2012, Elections (Technology) Regulations, 2017, and the Elections (Parliamentary) Regulations.

Issues

  1. Validity of the election results
  2. Compliance with election laws and regulations
  3. Access to information

Reasoning

The court ruled that the election was conducted in accordance with the law and that the respondents acted within their authority.

Outcome

The petition was dismissed.

Orders

  • Parties to strictly keep their timelines with a possibility of an agreement in reducing or increasing time allocated upon consultation and concurrence of the court.
  • The reading of the KIEMS diaries and information thereof to be undertaken by parties and the Deputy Registrar on 30/11/2017 at 2.30 p.m. in Nairobi 1st Respondent premises.

Authorities cited

Legislation (4)
  • Elections Act No. 24 of 2011
  • Elections (General) Regulations, 2012
  • Access to Information Act No. 31 of 2016
  • Electorial and Boundaries Commission Act No. 9 of 2016
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case