SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Mutisya Albanus Paul v Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission & 2 others [2017] KEHC 2754 (KLR)

[2017] KEHC 2754 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
2754
Citation
[2017] KEHC 2754 (KLR)
Decided
31 October 2017
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeElection PetitionPostureRespondents objected to Petitioner's supplementary affidavits and certificates, seeking their dismissal.CoramD. K. KEMEI
Holding

Petitioner's supplementary affidavits are admitted, and Respondents are granted leave to file a replying affidavit. Petitioner's two certificates are ordered struck out and expunged from the record.

Facts

Petitioner filed supplementary affidavits and certificates, while Respondents filed a replying affidavit. Petitioner also filed two certificates.

Issues

  1. Whether Petitioner's supplementary affidavits and certificates should be admitted.
  2. Whether Petitioner's two certificates should be admitted and expunged.

Reasoning

The court found the supplementary affidavits were not intended to amend the petition but to support the application for scrutiny. The certificates were filed outside the statutory period and were found to amend the petition, prejudicing the Respondents.

Outcome

Petitioner's supplementary affidavits are admitted, and Respondents are granted leave to file a replying affidavit. Petitioner's two certificates are expunged from the record.

Orders

  • Petitioner's supplementary affidavits are admitted.
  • Respondents are granted leave to file a replying affidavit.
  • Petitioner's two certificates are expunged from the record.

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • Elections (Parliamentary and County Elections) Petition Rules 2017
  • Elections Act No. 24 of 2011
  • Article 159(2)(d) of the Constitution of Kenya 2010
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case