SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Republic v Public Procurement Administrative Review Board Ex-Parte Geothermal Development Company Limited & another [2017] KEHC 2939 (KLR)

[2017] KEHC 2939 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
2939
Citation
[2017] KEHC 2939 (KLR)
Decided
17 October 2017
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeJudicial ReviewPostureAppeal from a decision of the Public Procurement Administrative Review Board
Holding

The Respondent's decision is quashed, and the Respondent is directed to hear the request for review de novo.

Facts

Geothermal Development Company Limited and Netfast Communications Limited applied for judicial review of the Public Procurement Administrative Review Board's decision to award a tender to M/S Lex Oilfield Solutions Limited. The applicants argued that the board had no jurisdiction to entertain the request for review due to the provisions of the Public Procurement and Asset Disposal Act.

Issues

  1. Whether the Respondent had jurisdiction to entertain the request for review.
  2. Whether the Respondent's decision was in accordance with the Public Procurement and Asset Disposal Act.

Reasoning

The court held that the Respondent's decision was not in accordance with the Public Procurement and Asset Disposal Act due to the provisions in section 4(2)(f) which excludes procurements under bilateral or multilateral agreements between the Government of Kenya and any other foreign government, agency, entity or multilateral agency unless as otherwise prescribed in the Regulations. The court also considered the constitutional provision that public procurement must be fair, equitable, transparent, competitive and cost-effective.

Outcome

The Respondent's decision is quashed.

Orders

  • The Respondent is directed to hear the request for review de novo.
  • There will be no order as to costs.

Remedies

  • The Respondent is directed to hear the request for review de novo.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Public Procurement and Asset Disposal Act, Cap 412A
  • Public Procurement and Asset Disposal Regulations, 2006
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case