SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

D M M v R M M [2017] KEHC 3072 (KLR)

[2017] KEHC 3072 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
3072
Citation
[2017] KEHC 3072 (KLR)
Decided
10 October 2017
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureApplicant seeks leave to amend his Petition of AppealCoramJ. KAMAU
Holding

The court allows the application to amend the Petition of Appeal

Facts

Applicant was committed to civil jail for failing to remit maintenance to the Respondent for a minor child. He filed a Petition of Appeal and sought to amend it due to a paternity dispute.

Issues

  1. Whether the court should grant leave to amend the Petition of Appeal
  2. Whether the Respondent would suffer prejudice if the application is allowed

Reasoning

The court allows the amendment as the Respondent has not demonstrated that she would suffer any prejudice that cannot be compensated by costs, and the Applicant would be prejudiced if the application is not allowed.

Outcome

The court grants leave to amend the Petition of Appeal

Orders

  • The Applicant is directed to file and serve his Amended Memorandum of Appeal within 14 days from the date of this Ruling
  • Costs shall be in the cause

Authorities cited

Cases cited (4)
  • Order 42 Rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Rules
  • Central Kenya Limited vs Trust Bank Limited & 5 Others
  • Elijah Kipngeno Arap Bii vs Kenya Commercial Bank Limited
  • Eastern Bakery vs Castelino
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case