A.G Riungu & Company Advocates v Michimikuru Tea Growers Sacco & another [2017] KEHC 3403 (KLR)
- Court
- High Court of Kenya
- Case number
- 3403
- Citation
- [2017] KEHC 3403 (KLR)
- Decided
- 21 September 2017
AI Summary
Beta
Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeMiscellaneous ApplicationPostureApplication for review of an order made by Onginjo J.CoramF. GIKONYO
Holding
The application for review of the order made by Onginjo J. is directed to be heard by her.
Facts
Not explicitly stated in the provided text.
Issues
- Review or variation of an order made by Onginjo J.
- Application for review to the court which passed the order.
Reasoning
The court ruled that the application should be heard by the judge who made the order, as per the Civil Procedure Act and Order 45 rule 2.
Outcome
The application for review is directed to be heard by Onginjo J.
Orders
- The file be transmitted immediately to Onginjo J who shall consider the application dated 4th April 2017.
Authorities cited
Legislation (2)
- Civil Procedure Act
- Order 45 rule 2
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Loading judgment…