SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Republic v Embu County Government ex-parte Mountain Slopes Commercial Services Ltd [2017] KEHC 3570 (KLR)

[2017] KEHC 3570 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
3570
Citation
[2017] KEHC 3570 (KLR)
Decided
19 September 2017
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeJudicial ReviewPostureApplication for Leave to Apply for Judicial ReviewCoramF. Mucemi
Holding

The application is incompetent and cannot be sustained.

Facts

The applicant, Mountain Slopes Commercial Services Ltd, is a manufacturer of opaque beer and made an application to renew its liquor licence for 2016. The respondent, Embu County Government, declined to renew the licence due to an ongoing case challenging the implementation of the Embu County Alcoholic Drinks Control Act, 2014.

Issues

  1. Whether the respondent's refusal to renew the applicant's liquor licence was illegal, ultra vires, null and void and in bad faith.
  2. Whether the applicant was denied his right to fair administrative action and a fair hearing as per Article 47 and 50 of the Constitution.

Reasoning

The court found the application incompetent due to its late filing and the applicant's failure to seek an extension of time. The court emphasized the importance of compliance with procedural rules and the duty of the defaulting party to seek such extensions.

Outcome

The application is struck out and each party meets its own costs.

Orders

  • The application is struck out.
  • Each party meets its own costs.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Embu County Alcoholic Drinks Control Act 2014
  • Fair Administrative Action Act of 2015
Cases cited (2)
  • Nairobi J.R. No. 270 of 2016 CABINET SECRETARY, INFORMATION COMMUNICATION & TECHNOLOGY & 3 OTHERS EXPARTE CELESTINE OKUTA & OTHERS
  • JOHN ONGERI MARIARIA & 2 OTHERS VS PAUL MATUNDURA Civil Application No. Nai. 301 of 2003 [2004] 2 EA 163
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case