SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Salma Muhiddin Ahmed v County Assembly of Kilifi & 2 others [2017] KEHC 381 (KLR)

[2017] KEHC 381 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
381
Citation
[2017] KEHC 381 (KLR)
Decided
26 July 2017
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeConstitutional PetitionPostureAppeal from the High Court of Kenya at MalindiCoramNot explicitly named in the text, but implied to be the presiding judge(s)
Holding

The court found that the petitioner was not given a fair hearing and that the petitioner's removal was not in accordance with the Constitution and relevant laws.

Facts

The petitioner, a member of the Executive Committee in charge of Education, Youth affairs and Sports in Kilifi County, was invited to appear before a Committee of general oversight and a Select Committee to address allegations of incompetence. The petitioner was subsequently removed from office by the County Assembly.

Issues

  1. Whether the petitioner's removal was in accordance with the Constitution and relevant laws.
  2. Whether the petitioner was given a fair hearing and due process.

Reasoning

The court held that the petitioner was not given an opportunity to challenge the findings of the oversight committee and that the petitioner was not given a fair hearing. The court also found that the petitioner was not given an opportunity to cross-examine witnesses.

Outcome

The court found in favor of the petitioner.

Orders

  • Granting a conservatory order to restrain the respondents from proceeding to impeach the petitioner pending the hearing and determination of the application.

Remedies

  • Costs of the application to be borne by the respondents.

Authorities cited

Legislation (3)
  • County Governments Act
  • Fair Administration of Justice Act
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010
Cases cited (1)
  • STEPHEN NENDELA V THE COUNTY ASSEMBLY of BUNGOMA & 3 OTHERS Bungoma Constitutiona
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case