SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

African Airlines International Ltd v Eastern & Southern African Trade & Development Bank (The PTA Bank) [2017] KEHC 5452 (KLR)

[2017] KEHC 5452 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
5452
Citation
[2017] KEHC 5452 (KLR)
Decided
4 May 2017
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil SuitPostureAppeal from a previous ruling dismissing the suit for want of prosecution
Holding

The Application dated 24th August 2015 is dismissed but with no order as to costs due to considerable delay in prosecution. The Application of 5th August 2014 is allowed with the Plaintiff filing and serving a further Amended Plaint within 14 days.

Facts

The Plaintiff filed an Application for Leave to Re-Amend the Amended Plaint on 5th August 2014, but was unable to lodge it due to the inactivity of the file since 29th April 2013. The Plaintiff filed a further Application on 24th August 2015.

Issues

  1. Whether the Plaintiff's delay in prosecuting the suit is inordinate and inexcusable
  2. Whether the Defendant's application to dismiss the suit for want of prosecution should be granted

Reasoning

The court considered the principles set out by Cheson J. in Ivita vs. Kyumbu, stating that the test for dismissing a suit for want of prosecution is whether the delay is prolonged and inexcusable.

Outcome

The Plaintiff's Application of 5th August 2014 is allowed, and the Defendant's Application of 24th August 2015 is dismissed.

Orders

  • The Plaintiff shall file and serve a further Amended Plaint within 14 days
  • The Defendant shall have 14 days to amend its Pleadings

Remedies

  • The Plaintiff's Application of 5th August 2014 is allowed
  • The Defendant's Application of 24th August 2015 is dismissed

Authorities cited

Cases cited (1)
  • Ivita vs. Kyumbu (1984) 441
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case