SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

John Mathiaka Kimundu v Lawrence Mwangi t/a Lawrence Mwangi & Co Advocates [2017] KEHC 5832 (KLR)

[2017] KEHC 5832 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
5832
Citation
[2017] KEHC 5832 (KLR)
Decided
13 April 2017
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil SuitPostureAppeal from an order striking out the suit with costs and an application to vary the taxation of the costsCoramJ.N.MULWA
Holding

The taxing officer erred in awarding and adding one half of the instructions fees and getting up fees to the instructions fees. The objection to the taxation was filed out of time.

Facts

The plaintiff filed a suit against the defendant, which was struck out with costs on March 5, 2015. The plaintiff then applied to vary the taxation of the costs, raising the bill by half and awarding getting up fees to the defendant.

Issues

  1. Whether the taxing officer erred in awarding and adding one half of the instructions fees and getting up fees to the instructions fees
  2. Whether the objection to the taxation was filed out of time

Reasoning

The court found that the taxing officer erred in treating the party and party bill of costs as an advocate-client bill of costs and adding half of the instructions fees. The court also found that the objection to the taxation was filed out of time.

Outcome

The application to vary the taxation of the costs is allowed, and the party and party bill of costs is re-assessed and adjusted to Kshs.57,438/75.

Orders

  • The taxing officer's ruling is set aside and varied.
  • The party and party bill of costs dated 2nd June 2015 is re-assessed and adjusted to Kshs.57,438/75.
  • Interim orders of stay of execution issued on the 10th October 2016 are discharged.

Remedies

  • The party and party bill of costs is re-assessed and adjusted to Kshs.57,438/75.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Advocates Renumeration Order 2014
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case