SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Al-Riaz International Limited v Ganjoni Properties Limited [2017] KEHC 658 (KLR)

[2017] KEHC 658 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
658
Citation
[2017] KEHC 658 (KLR)
Decided
13 November 2017
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil SuitPostureAppeal from an order granting a stay of execution of an order for execution of a decreeCoramP.
Holding

The court granted the application for a stay of execution of the order for the release of the motor vehicles pending the inter partes hearing of the appeal.

Facts

The plaintiff sought a stay of execution of an order for the release of two motor vehicles from execution, claiming that the vehicles were unregistered and needed to be registered before they could be used for registration purposes. The defendant opposed the application, arguing that the plaintiff had not paid rent and that the vehicles were being kept by the plaintiff's landlord.

Issues

  1. Whether the plaintiff's application for a stay of execution of the order for the release of the motor vehicles is justified
  2. Whether the plaintiff has demonstrated substantial loss and provided security for the due performance of the decree

Reasoning

The court found that the plaintiff's application was not delayed and that there were prospects of substantial loss. The court also noted that the plaintiff had provided security for the due performance of the decree.

Outcome

The court granted the application for a stay of execution of the order for the release of the motor vehicles.

Orders

  • Stay of execution of the order for the release of the motor vehicles pending the inter partes hearing of the appeal

Remedies

  • Stay of execution of the order for the release of the motor vehicles

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Civil Procedure Rules
Cases cited (2)
  • Adah Nyabook vs Uganda Holding Properties Ltd [2012] eKLR
  • Daniel Chebutul Rotich vs Emirates Airlines, HCC No. 368 of 2001
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case