SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Sumac Development Company Limited v George Munyui Kigathi & 2 others [2017] KEHC 6710 (KLR)

[2017] KEHC 6710 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
6710
Citation
[2017] KEHC 6710 (KLR)
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivilPosturePreliminary objection filed by 3rd defendantCoramL. NJUGUNA
Holding

The plaintiff's suit against the 3rd defendant is struck out with costs.

Facts

The plaintiff filed a suit claiming breach of contract for sale of land, which was amended to include Kenya National Highway Authority as a defendant. The 3rd defendant filed a preliminary objection alleging non-compliance with section 67(a) of the Kenya Roads Act.

Issues

  1. Non-compliance with section 67(a) of the Kenya Roads Act
  2. Statutory limitation

Reasoning

The court found that the plaintiff did not comply with the mandatory provisions of section 67(a) of the Kenya Roads Act, which requires at least 30 days notice before filing a suit against the Kenya National Highway Authority. The court also noted that the cause of action against the 3rd defendant arose on 8th October, 2010, and the suit was filed on 2nd June, 2015, which was beyond the statutory limitation period.

Outcome

The plaintiff's suit against the 3rd defendant is dismissed.

Orders

  • The plaintiff's suit against the 3rd defendant is struck out with costs.

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Kenya Roads Act, Cap 2007
  • Government Proceedings Act
Cases cited (3)
  • Osborn Vs. Bank of the United States 22 U.S. 738, 866 (1824)
  • Aggrery Simiyu Vs. Kenya Railways Corporation Civil Case No. 36 of 2010 (2010) eKLR
  • Langat Vs. KPTC (2002) 2EA. 436 (CAK)
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case