SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Muriithi Kireria & Associates Advocates v Kenya Planters Co-operative Union Limited [2017] KEHC 7198 (KLR)

[2017] KEHC 7198 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
7198
Citation
[2017] KEHC 7198 (KLR)
Decided
10 March 2017
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCommercial & AdmiraltyPostureAppeal from a judgment of the High Court of Kenya at NairobiCoramJ. LONGUTO
Holding

The application by the Union to stay proceedings will be and is hereby dismissed. The Advocate's Bill of Costs filed on 30th September 2014 is to be taxed de novo in default of any agreement between the Union and the Advocate on any fees payable.

Facts

The Union appointed the Advocate to act for them in a High Court Civil Case No. 779 of 2009. The Advocate acted for the Union and filed a Notice of Change of Advocates. The Advocate filed a Bill of Costs on 30th September 2014.

Issues

  1. Whether there existed a retainer as between the Advocate and the Respondent Union
  2. Whether the Advocate's Bill of Costs should be taxed de novo in default of any agreement between the Union and the Advocate

Reasoning

The court held that a personal retainer was agreed orally and implied by the client’s conduct in employing the attorney to carry out the work as requested. The court dismissed the Union's application to stay proceedings and ordered the Advocate's Bill of Costs to be taxed de novo.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The application by the Union to stay proceedings will be and is hereby dismissed.
  • An attempt to agree on the fees must first be made.
  • The Advocate's Bill of Costs filed on 30th September 2014 is to be taxed de novo in default of any agreement between the Union and the Advocate on any fees payable.
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case