SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Adams & another v Republic (Criminal Appeal 106 & 107 of 2015) [2017] KEHC 7720 (KLR) (23 February 2017) (Judgment)

[2017] KEHC 7720 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
7720
Citation
[2017] KEHC 7720 (KLR)
Decided
23 February 2017
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCriminal AppealPostureAppeal from conviction and sentenceCoramJ.A. Makaau-, Sarah Ooro
Holding

The appeals are allowed, conviction and sentence quashed, appellants set at liberty

Facts

Two appellants were charged with robbery with violence. The prosecution alleged they robbed Kevin Onyango Oponyo of cash, credit cards, and mobile phones on June 2, 2014. The appellants were convicted and sentenced to death.

Issues

  1. Defectiveness of the charge
  2. Violation of constitutional rights
  3. Insufficiency of evidence to prove the charge
  4. Inadequate identification parade

Reasoning

The prosecution failed to prove the charge beyond reasonable doubt. The identification parade was flawed and of no probative value. The appellants' defence of alibi was considered but not properly addressed by the trial court.

Outcome

Appeals allowed, conviction and sentence quashed

Orders

  • Quash conviction and set aside sentence
  • Set appellants at liberty
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case