SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Republic v The Kenya Medical Laboratory Technicians And Technologists Board Ex-Parte Edna Mwende Kavindu [2017] KEHC 7788 (KLR)

[2017] KEHC 7788 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
7788
Citation
[2017] KEHC 7788 (KLR)
Decided
17 January 2017
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeJudicial ReviewPostureEx parte application for orders of certiorari, mandamus and prohibitionCoramHonourable Korir
Holding

The notice of motion is struck out as incompetent due to non-compliance with the court order.

Facts

The applicant sought leave to institute judicial review proceedings against the Kenya Medical Laboratory Technicians and Technologists Board. The court granted leave and stayed the respondent's decision to charge the applicant's annual practice license.

Issues

  1. Whether the applicant's notice of motion was filed within the stipulated timeframe
  2. Whether the court can ignore its own order and proceed to determine the motion on its merits

Reasoning

The court found that the notice of motion was filed outside the 10-day timeframe granted for filing the motion, and proceeded to determine the motion on its merits would be futile.

Outcome

The notice of motion is struck out, and each party bears their own costs.

Orders

  • The notice of motion is struck out
  • Each party bears their own costs

Authorities cited

Legislation (4)
  • Law Reform Act
  • Constitution of Kenya, 2010
  • Medical Laboratories Technicians and Technologists Act
  • Fair Administrative Action Act
Cases cited (2)
  • Republic v Cabinet Secretary, Information, Communication & Technology & Another Ex Parte Celestine Okuta & Others [2016] eKLR
  • EA 163
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case