SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Peris Nyabate Nyambane v Robert Omae Nyambane [2017] KEHC 7896 (KLR)

[2017] KEHC 7896 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
7896
Citation
[2017] KEHC 7896 (KLR)
Decided
7 February 2017
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeSuccessionPosturePetition for Letters of Administration Intestate vs Affidavit of ProtestCoramJ.R. Karanjah
Holding

The court rules that the deceased's estate should be divided between his two houses, with the Petitioner entitled to a portion of Plot No. 1585 and the entire portion of Plot No. 3304. Plots No. B5 and No. 9362 are not part of the estate.

Facts

The deceased, John Nyambane Kinara, left an estate consisting of two plots of land. The Petitioner, Peris Nyabate Nyambane, obtained letters of administration intestate. The Objector, Robert Omae Nyambane, contested the grant, claiming the Petitioner was not entitled to a portion of the estate.

Issues

  1. Distribution of the deceased's estate
  2. Ownership of specific plots of land

Reasoning

The court finds that the deceased's estate should be divided according to the provisions of the Law of Succession Act, with the Petitioner entitled to a portion of Plot No. 1585 and the entire portion of Plot No. 3304.

Outcome

The court orders the Petitioner to amend her summons to exclude the property unavailable for distribution and to apply the mode of distribution prescribed by the law.

Orders

  • Petitioner to amend summons to exclude Plots No. B5 and No. 9362
  • Petitioner to apply for confirmation of grant with proportional distribution of available property

Remedies

  • Amendment of summons to exclude disputed plots

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Law of Succession Act (Cap 160 LOK)
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.1 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case