SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Republic v Public Procurement Administrative Review Board Ex parte Athi Water Services Board & 2 others [2017] [2017] KEHC 8297 (KLR)

[2017] KEHC 8297 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
8297
Citation
[2017] KEHC 8297 (KLR)
Decided
9 January 2017
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeJudicial ReviewPostureAppeal from a decision of the Public Procurement Administrative Review BoardCoramG V Odunga
Holding

The applicants' applications are merited, and the decision of the Public Procurement Administrative Review Board is quashed.

Facts

The Public Procurement Administrative Review Board (PAB) declared the tender of Magic General Contractors Limited (MGL) successful for the rehabilitation of water supply and sewerage for Oloitoktok Town Project. The applicants, Athi Water Services Board and Machiri Limited, challenged the decision.

Issues

  1. Interpretation of the Respondent's decision
  2. Substantial responsiveness of the tender

Reasoning

The Board's decision to declare the tender unsuccessful at the technical evaluation stage was based on a misinterpretation of the regulations, and the applicants' arguments were supported.

Outcome

The decision of the Public Procurement Administrative Review Board is quashed.

Orders

  • Decision removed to this Honourable Court for purposes of being quashed
  • 1st Applicant to issue a letter of award and complete the procurement within 14 days
  • Interested Party's tender to be subject to financial evaluation alongside three other bidders

Remedies

  • Quashing of the decision

Authorities cited

Legislation (2)
  • Public Procurement and Disposal Act
  • Public Procurement and Asset Disposal Act
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.3 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case