SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Asitbhai T. Hussein v Hasham Tarmohamed Hussein & another [2017] KEHC 8809 (KLR)

[2017] KEHC 8809 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
8809
Citation
[2017] KEHC 8809 (KLR)
Decided
3 March 2017
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeCivil AppealPostureAppeal from the Judgement of Hon. Sheikh Twalib B. Mohamed, KadhiCoramM. THANDE
Holding

The Hon. Kadhi had jurisdiction to determine the matter and the Respondents have a share in the Property.

Facts

The deceased, Tarmohamed Hussein, died leaving an estate including 1/3 share in Mombasa/Block XV/147. His widow, Aminabai Suleiman, and his children filed a suit in the Kadhi's Court seeking distribution of the estate and other relief. The Appellant, Asitbhai Tarmohamed Hussein, claimed the Property was hers, while the Respondents claimed it was part of the estate.

Issues

  1. Whether the Hon. Kadhi had jurisdiction to determine the matter.
  2. Whether the Respondents have a share in the Property which is duly registered in the Appellant’s name.

Reasoning

The Hon. Kadhi found that the distribution of the estate by the widow was not in accordance with Islamic law. The Hon. Kadhi ordered the Appellant to account for the shares of all heirs and to buy off the other heirs by giving them their respective shares.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The Appellant to account for the shares of all heirs and to buy off the other heirs by giving them their respective shares.
  • A valuation of 1/3 interest in Mombasa/Block XV/147 to be done and the Appellant to buy off the other heirs by giving them their respective shares.
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case