SheriaNet for Android — search and read Kenyan case law from your phone, offline.
Join the beta →

Republic v Retirement Benefits Authority Exparte Abraham Mackie Mutisya Kilonzo & 39 others [2017] KEHC 928 (KLR)

[2017] KEHC 928 (KLR) High Court of Kenya
Read PDF
Court
High Court of Kenya
Case number
928
Citation
[2017] KEHC 928 (KLR)
Decided
7 December 2017
AI Summary Beta Machine-generated — may contain errors. Not legal advice.
TypeJudicial ReviewPostureApplication for Leave to Apply for Judicial Review Orders of MandamusCoramMajanja, WANGUI MATU, ANTHONY A.
Holding

The court lacks jurisdiction to entertain the application as the matter is subjudice the pending appeal before the tribunal.

Facts

The applicants are members of the Housing Finance Company of Kenya Pension Scheme. They filed an application for leave to apply for judicial review orders of mandamus to compel the respondent (Retirement Benefits Authority) to determine their complaint filed on 15th April 2014 in accordance with the Retirement Benefits Act. The respondent filed a preliminary objection contending that the matter was subjudice as the subject matter is pending before the Retirement Benefits Tribunal.

Issues

  1. Whether this court has jurisdiction to hear and determine the application by the exparte applicants and if so
  2. Whether the application for leave is merited
  3. What orders should this court make
  4. Who should bear the costs of the application

Reasoning

The court considers the application for leave, the preliminary objection by the respondent, and the submissions filed by both parties' advocates. The court concludes that the matter is subjudice as the subject matter is pending before the Retirement Benefits Tribunal.

Outcome

The court dismisses the application for leave to apply for judicial review orders of mandamus.

Authorities cited

Legislation (1)
  • Retirement Benefits Act, Cap 197 Laws of Kenya
Experimental AI summary generated by a language model, not a lawyer. It may contain errors or omissions and must not be relied on for legal decisions — the full judgment below is the authoritative source.
Full judgment 0.2 MB · PDF

Loading judgment…

Cite this case


        
        
      

Share this case